Rescuing Justice and Equality
- The Big Issue
- Rescuing Equality and Justice
- Some Methodological Disagreements
- Justice and Fairness
- The Two Standpoints
- The Greatness of John Rawls
- An Outline of the Book
Part One: Rescuing Equality from...
1. The Incentives Argument
I. The Incentives Argument, The Interpersonal Test, and Community
- Incentives, the Difference Principle, and Equality
- Nigel Lawson’s Tax Cut
- On Uttering Arguments in Variable Interpersonal Settings
- The Kidnapper’s Argument
- Community, and the Interpersonal Test
- Does the Incentive Argument Pass the Interpersonal Test?
II. Testing the Incentive Argument
- What Makes the Minor Premiss of the Incentive Argument True?
- Why the Incentive Argument Fails the Interpersonal Test
- The Incentive Argument and Bad Faith
- Should the Poor Reject the Incentive Argument?
- First Persons and Third Persons
III. Incentives and the Difference Principle
- Strict and Lax Readings of the Difference Principle
- Why Just People Must Practise the Strict Difference Principle
- The Difference Principle and “Daily Life”
- Dignity, Fraternity, and The Difference Principle
- The Difference Principle and “Mutual Indifference”
- The Difference Principle and the Unjust Society
2. The Pareto Argument for Inequality
- Introduction
- The Argument Expounded
- The Argument Challenged
- The Argument Rejected
- Labour Burden in the Metric of Equality
- Inconsistent Metrics
- Raising the Baseline
- Impartiality and Mutual Advantage
- Inequality: A Necessary Evil?
- Conclusion
3. The Basic Structure Objection
- “The Personal is Political”
- Incentives and the Difference Principle: A Review of the Argument
- The “Basic Structure” Objection
- The “Basic Structure” Objection: A Preliminary Reply
- The “Basic Structure” Objection: A More Fundamental Reply
- Who is to Blame?
- Coercive and Non-Coercive Social Structures
- Appendix I. More on Coercion and the Basic Structure
- Appendix II. The Basic Structure is a Structure
4. The Difference Principle
- Introduction
- Reconsidering the Difference Principle
- The Moral Arbitrariness Case for the Difference Principle Contradicts its Content
- A Recent Argument for the Difference Principle
- A Contractarian Argument for the Difference Principle
- What is the Moral Arbitrariness of Talent Differences Supposed to Show?
- Chamberlain and Pareto
- “Can’t” or “Won’t”
- Human Nature and Constructivism
5. The Freedom Objection
- Introduction
- Equality, Pareto, and Freedom of Choice of Occupation
- Equality, Pareto, and Rawlsian Liberty
- Equality, Pareto, and Freedom in Work
- The Unequal-Income Inference
- Blood, Kidneys, and Sex
6. The Facts
- A Statement of my Thesis
- Facts, and Some Meta-Ethical Questions
- What Most Philosophers Think about Facts and Principles
- My Thesis: Ultimate Principles are Fact-Insensitive; and the Clarity of Mind Requirement
- An Illustration of the Thesis
- More Illustration of the Thesis
- The Argument for the Thesis
- (i). A Defence of the First Premiss of the Argument
- (ii). A Defence of the Second Premiss of the Argument
- (iii). A Defence of the Third Premiss of the Argument
- Still Further Illustration and Defence of the Thesis
- The Clarity of Mind Requirement
- The Merely Logical Priority of Fact-Insensitive Principles
- The Conditional Character of the Thesis
- On “Is” and “Ought”
- On “Ought” and “Can”
- Possible Misunderstandings of the Thesis
- The Thesis is not a Causal Thesis
- The Thesis is not a Psychological Thesis
- The Thesis is Neutral with Respect to Central Meta-Ethical Disputes
- Some Bad Rawlsian Arguments that Reject My Thesis
- Utilitarianism, and the Difference Between Fundamental Principles and Rules of Regulation
- The Interest of My Thesis
Part Two: Rescuing Justice from. . .
7. Constructivism
- Introduction, and Preliminary Overview
- Fundamental Principles of Justice and Constructivism
- Fundamental Principles of Justice and Constructivism: Matters Arising
- Is Justice the First Virtue of Social Institutions?
- Two Illustrations: Social Insurance, Property Taxation
- Justice and the Pareto Principle
- Justice, and Constraints, Notably Publicity, on Choice of Optimal Rules at Regulation
- Justice and Stability
- The “Circumstances of Justice”
- Conclusion
- Appendix: Is the Original Position Justification of Principles Contractarian?
8. The Publicity Argument
- Andrew Williams on Publicity and the Egalitarian Ethos
- An Anatomy of Williams’s Argument
- Racism, Justice, and Assurance
- Does Assurance Williams-type Determinacy?
- Does Justice Require Precision?
- Egalitarian Ethi at Home, in the Market, and in the State
- Publicity as a Desideratum of Justice
- Justice and Occupational Choice
- Conclusion
General Appendix: Replies to critics
- Public and Private Action
- The Site of Justice is not Where it Gets Caused
- Prior Principles, Self-Respect, and Equality
- Incentives and Prerogatives
- Pogge’s Mastergoals and Supergoals
- Pogge’s Failure to Address the Standard Case
- The Currency of Distributive Justice and Incentive Inequality
- Earlier Discussions of Rawls on Incentives
Awards
- Shortlist, 2010 C.B. MacPherson Prize, Canadian Political Science Association
- 2008 North American Society for Social Philosophy Book Award