The Fifth Branch
Science Advisers as Policymakers
Sheila Jasanoff
1. Rationalizing Politics
The Rise of Social Regulation
Science and Policymaking
Expertise and Trust
The Contingency of Knowledge
The Reform Debate
An Alternative Approach
2. Flawed Decisions
Nitrites
2,4,5-T
Love Canal
Estimates of Occupational Cancer
The Technocratic Response
A Critical Counterpoint
3. Science for the People
The Rationale for Public Science
The "New" Expert Agency
Scientific Advice and Open Government
Judicial Review of Science Policy
The Weakening of the Paradigm
4. Peer Review and Regulatory Science
The Traditions of Peer Review
Peer Review in Practice
Instructive Failures Regulatory Science: Content and Context
Implications for Regulatory Peer Review
5. EPA and the Science Advisory Board
Early Political Challenges
A New Cooperation Boundary Exercises
SAB's Impact on Policy
Conclusion
6. The Science and Policy of Clean Air
CASAC and the NAAQS Process
Science and Standards
Redefining CASAC's Role
The Carbon Monoxide Controversy
CASAC's Effectiveness: Bridging Science and Policy
7. Advisers as Adversaries
The Scientific Advisory Panel
Implementing the Impossible
Ethylene Dibromide
Dicofol
Alar
A Fragmentation of Authority
8. FDA's Advisory Network
The Scientific Evaluation of Drugs
Expertise and Food Safety
Advice and Decision
9. Coping with New Knowledge
The Quest for Principled Risk Assessment
Formaldehyde: An Uncertain Carcinogen
Conclusion
10. Technocracy Revisited
A Public-Private Partnership for Science
Risk Assessment without Politics
The Public Board of Inquiry
Wider Applications
11. The Political Function of Good Science
From Advice to Policy
Acceptable Risk
Scientific Advice as Legitimation: Negotiation and Boundary Work
Defining "Good Science"
Normative Implications
Conclusion
Notes
Index



![[Add to Cart]](../site_graphics/order/add_cart.jpg)