HARVARD HISTORICAL STUDIES
Cover: The Science of Culture in Enlightenment Germany, from Harvard University PressCover: The Science of Culture in Enlightenment Germany in HARDCOVER

Harvard Historical Studies 159

The Science of Culture in Enlightenment Germany

Add to Cart

Product Details

HARDCOVER

$73.50 • £58.95 • €66.00

ISBN 9780674026179

Publication Date: 01/31/2008

Short

374 pages

6-1/8 x 9-1/4 inches

8 halftones, 1 line, 4 maps

Harvard Historical Studies

World

In the late 1770s, as a wave of revolution and republican unrest swept across Europe, scholars looked with urgency on the progress of European civilization. The question of social development was addressed from Edinburgh to St. Petersburg, with German scholars, including C. G. Heyne, Christoph Meiners, and J. G. Eichhorn, at the center of the discussion.

Michael Carhart examines their approaches to understanding human development by investigating the invention of a new analytic category, “culture.” In an effort to define human nature and culture, scholars analyzed ancient texts for insights into language and the human mind in its early stages, together with writings from modern travelers, who provided data about various primitive societies. Some scholars began to doubt the existence of any essential human nature, arguing instead for human culture. If language was the vehicle of reason, what did it mean that all languages were different? Were rationality and virtue universal or unique to a given nation?

In this scholarship lie the roots of anthropology, sociology, and classical philology. Dissecting the debates over nature versus culture in Enlightenment Europe, Carhart offers a valuable contribution to cultural and intellectual history and the history of the human sciences.

Recent News

Black lives matter. Black voices matter. A statement from HUP »

From Our Blog

Jacket: We Have Never Been Modern, by Bruno Latour, translated by Catherine Porter, from Harvard University Press

Bruno Latour Wins Kyoto Prize

Congratulations to Bruno Latour for being named the 2021 Kyoto Prize laureate for arts and philosophy. To celebrate, here’s an excerpt from We Have Never Been Modern. By claiming that the modern Constitution does not permit itself to be understood, by proposing to reveal the practices that allow it to exist, by asserting that the critical mechanism has outlived its usefulness, am I behaving as though we were entering a new era that would follow the era of the moderns?