Cover: Guilt and Defense: On the Legacies of National Socialism in Postwar Germany, from Harvard University PressCover: Guilt and Defense in HARDCOVER

Guilt and Defense

On the Legacies of National Socialism in Postwar Germany

Add to Cart

Product Details

HARDCOVER

$53.00 • £42.95 • €47.50

ISBN 9780674036031

Publication Date: 06/15/2010

Short

256 pages

6-1/8 x 9-1/4 inches

1 table

World

  • Preface and Acknowledgments
  • Note on Translation
  • The Original Publications
  • Part I: Introduction
    • Guilt and Defense: Theodor Adorno and the Legacies of National Socialism in German Society [Jeffrey K. Olick and Andrew J. Perrin]
  • Part II: Guilt and Defense [Theodor W. Adorno]
    • Final Version of the Basic Stimulus (Colburn Letter)
    • Preface
    • Guilt and Defense
      • I. Knowledge of the Events
      • II. Guilt
      • III. The Self-Image of the Participants
      • IV. The Reality behind Defensiveness: Truth and Ideology
      • V. Defense
      • VI. Elements of National Socialist Ideology
      • VII. The Ambivalent Ones
      • VIII. Open-minded Participants
  • Part III: The Debate with Hofstätter
    • “On Group Experiment by F. Pollock: A Critical Appraisal” [Peter R. Hofstätter]
    • “Reply to Peter R. Hofstätter’s Critique of Group Experiment” [Theodor W. Adorno]
  • Part IV: Working Through the Past
    • “The Meaning of Working Through the Past” [Theodor W. Adorno]
  • Index

Recent News

Black lives matter. Black voices matter. A statement from HUP »

From Our Blog

Jacket: An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, by Bruno Latour, translated by Catherine Porter, from Harvard University Press

Honoring Latour

In awarding Bruno Latour the 2021 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy, the Inamori Foundation said he has “revolutionized the conventional view of science” and “his philosophy re-examines ‘modernity’ based on the dualism of nature and society.” Below is an excerpt from An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. For more than twenty years, scientific and technological controversies have proliferated in number and scope, eventually reaching the climate itself. Since geologists are beginning to use the term “Anthropocene” to designate the era of Earth’s history that follows the Holocene