Cover: Cerebral Dominance in PAPERBACK

Cerebral Dominance

The Biological Foundations

Add to Cart

Product Details

PAPERBACK

$45.00 • £36.95 • €40.50

ISBN 9780674106598

Publication Date: 10/15/1988

Short

243 pages

World

    • 1. Historical Introduction [Norman Geschwind]
  • I. Brain Asymmetry in Humans
    • 2. Anatomical Asymmetries [Albert M. Galaburda]
    • 3. Radiological, Developmental, and Fossil Asymmetries [Marjorie LeMay]
    • 4. A Dendritic Correlate of Human Speech [Arnold B. Scheibel]
    • 5. Brain Electrical Activity Mapping [Frank H. Duffy, Gloria B. McAnulty, and Steven C. Schachter]
    • 6. Asymmetrical Lesions in Dyslexia [Thomas L. Kemper]
  • II. Brain Asymmetry in Other Species
    • 7. Learning, Forgetting, and Brain Repair [Fernando Nottebohm]
    • 8. Behavioral Asymmetry [Victor H. Denenberg]
    • 9. Age, Sex, and Environmental Influences [Marian Cleeves Diamond]
    • 10. Functional and Neurochemical Asymmetries [Stanley D. Glick and Raymond M. Shapiro]
    • 11. Lateralization of Neuroendocrine Control [Ida Gerendai]
    • 12. Experimental Modification of Gyral Patterns [Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic and Pasko Rakic]
  • III. Biological Associations of Laterality
    • 13. Twinning, Handedness, and the Biology of Symmetry [Charles E. Boklage]
    • 14. Laterality, Hormones, and Immunity [Norman Geschwind and Peter O. Behan]
  • Contributors
  • Index

Recent News

Black lives matter. Black voices matter. A statement from HUP »

From Our Blog

Jacket: An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, by Bruno Latour, translated by Catherine Porter, from Harvard University Press

Honoring Latour

In awarding Bruno Latour the 2021 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy, the Inamori Foundation said he has “revolutionized the conventional view of science” and “his philosophy re-examines ‘modernity’ based on the dualism of nature and society.” Below is an excerpt from An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. For more than twenty years, scientific and technological controversies have proliferated in number and scope, eventually reaching the climate itself. Since geologists are beginning to use the term “Anthropocene” to designate the era of Earth’s history that follows the Holocene