Cover: Essays on Anscombe’s <i>Intention</i>, from Harvard University PressCover: Essays on Anscombe’s <i>Intention</i> in PAPERBACK

Essays on Anscombe’s Intention

Product Details

PAPERBACK

Print on Demand

$31.00 • £26.95 • €28.95

ISBN 9780674284265

Publication Date: 03/24/2014

Text

324 pages

6-1/8 x 9-1/4 inches

World

Add to Cart

Educators: Request an Exam Copy (Learn more)

Media Requests:

Related Subjects

G. E. M. Anscombe’s Intention firmly established the philosophy of action as a distinctive field of inquiry. Donald Davidson called this 94-page book “the most important treatment of action since Aristotle.” But until quite recently, few scholars recognized the magnitude of Anscombe’s philosophical achievement. This collection of ten essays elucidates some of the more challenging aspects of Anscombe’s work and affirms her reputation as one of our most original philosophers.

Born in 1919, Anscombe studied at St. Hugh’s College, Oxford, where she later held a research fellowship. In 1941 she married philosopher Peter Geach, with whom she had seven children. A close friend of Wittgenstein, in 1946 she joined Oxford’s Somerville College and spent the next twenty-four years there before being appointed to the Chair of Philosophy at Cambridge that Wittgenstein had held. She died in 2001 after her long career as a highly regarded analytic philosopher.

This volume brings together fresh interpretations of Intention written by some of today’s leading philosophers of action. It will enlighten Anscombe’s readers who struggle with concepts they find puzzling or obscure, while providing a bracing corrective to doubts about Intention’s significance and the gravity of what is at stake.

From Our Blog

The Burnout Challenge

On Burnout Today with Christina Maslach and Michael P. Leiter

In The Burnout Challenge, leading researchers of burnout Christina Maslach and Michael P. Leiter focus on what occurs when the conditions and requirements set by a workplace are out of sync with the needs of people who work there. These “mismatches,” ranging from work overload to value conflicts, cause both workers and workplaces to suffer