Cover: Democracy’s Detectives: The Economics of Investigative Journalism, from Harvard University PressCover: Democracy’s Detectives in HARDCOVER

Democracy’s Detectives

The Economics of Investigative Journalism

Add to Cart

Product Details

HARDCOVER

$36.00 • £28.95 • €32.50

ISBN 9780674545502

Publication Date: 10/10/2016

Text

384 pages

6-1/8 x 9-1/4 inches

2 line illustrations, 38 tables

World

  • List of Tables*
  • Introduction
  • 1. Economic Theories of Investigative Reporting
  • 2. Detectives, Muckrakers, and Watchdogs
  • 3. What’s the Story?
  • 4. What’s the Impact?
  • 5. How Is It Produced?
  • 6. How Is It Supported?
  • 7. A Single Investigative Reporter
  • 8. Accountability and Algorithms
  • Notes
  • Acknowledgments
  • Index
  • * Tables
    • 2.1. Principal-agent indices for newspaper content, by decade, 1870–1979
    • 2.2. Ranking of principal-agent indices, within decades, 1870–1979
    • 2.3. Circulation of McClure’s Magazine by population size and region, 1917
    • 2.4. Distribution of journalism award citations across news outlets, 1918–2013
    • 2.5. Production of journalism cited in awards, 1990–2013
    • 2.6. Age and Pulitzer Prizes, 1918–2012
    • 2.7. Media as sources of information in congressional hearings, 1946–2010
    • 2.8. Product differentiation in network evening news, 1989–2012
    • 3.1. Top story topics among IRE contest entries
    • 3.2. IRE contest entries by entry type, medium, medium size, and decade
    • 3.3. Policy agenda area coverage, 1980–2009, IRE contest entries vs. policy venues
    • 3.4. Percentage of IRE contest entries within policy agenda area and focus, by medium
    • 3.5. Policy agenda area and findings of IRE contest entries, by medium size, 1994–2010
    • 4.1. Impacts of IRE contest entries, by medium
    • 4.2. Impacts of IRE contest entries, by story finding
    • 4.3. Impacts of ProPublica investigations, 2010–2012
    • 4.4. Assessing the benefits and costs of investigative journalism: publishing, consuming, and policy impacts
    • 4.5. Costs and benefits of investigative series, for first year of policy change
    • 5.1. Production characteristics of IRE contest entries by medium
    • 5.2. Production characteristics of IRE contest entries, by findings and impacts
    • 5.3. Percentage of tip sheet author affiliations by organization type, by time period
    • 5.4. Organizations with twenty or more IRE tip sheet author affiliations, 1987–2011
    • 5.5. Timing and target of FOIA requests by type of media outlet, 2005–2010
    • 5.6. Characteristics of FOIA requests by organizations with twenty or more requests, 2005–2010
    • 6.1. News outlets and programs with fifty or more submissions to IRE contests
    • 6.2. Change in IRE contest entries, 2006–2007 versus 2008–2009
    • 6.3. Newspaper characteristics by IRE entry history
    • 6.4. Newspaper characteristics by company ownership
    • 6.5. Topics covered in IRE book list by authors associated with newspapers and magazines
    • 6.6. Nonprofit donors and federal political contributions
    • 6.7. 2012 election campaign contributions to Barack Obama and Mitt Romney by nonprofit media donors
    • 7.1. Principal-agent problems in Change versus Dinger stories reported by Pat Stith
    • 7.2. Organizations in North Carolina investigated, and time period of, Change versus Dinger stories reported by Pat Stith
    • 7.3. Frequency distribution of types and impacts of Pat Stith stories
    • 7.4. Relationship between principal-agent problems and impacts for stories by Pat Stith
    • 7.5. Impacts on specific individuals generated by reporting of Pat Stith
    • 7.6. Funds shifted or values affected because of reporting by Pat Stith
    • 7.7. Laws in North Carolina generated by reporting of Pat Stith
    • 7.8. Reactions to “North Carolina Water: Safe to Drink?”
    • 7.9. Selected Pat Stith interview questions with Terry Pierce, director, Division of Environmental Health, NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), February 7, 2006

From Our Blog

Jacket: Out of My Skull: The Psychology of Boredom, by James Danckert and John D. Eastwood, from Harvard University Press

Responding to Boredom during Self-Isolation

No one likes to be bored, but it’s almost inevitable during this time of social distancing and self-quaratine. John D. Eastwood, coauthor of Out of My Skull: The Psychology of Boredom, explains some things that we know about boredom, how to address it—and even what we can gain from it. We have been here before. During the SARS outbreak of 2003, upwards of 23,000 people in the Greater Toronto Area were quarantined. House

‘manifold glories of classical Greek and Latin’

The digital Loeb Classical Library (loebclassics.com) extends the founding mission of James Loeb with an interconnected, fully searchable, perpetually growing virtual library of all that is important in Greek and Latin literature.