Cover: Visual Field Defects after Penetrating Missile Wounds of the Brain, from Harvard University PressCover: Visual Field Defects after Penetrating Missile Wounds of the Brain in E-DITION

Visual Field Defects after Penetrating Missile Wounds of the Brain

Product Details


$65.00 • £54.95 • €60.00

ISBN 9780674593121

Publication Date: 01/01/1960

143 pages



Available from De Gruyter »

Media Requests:

Related Subjects

Harvard University Press has partnered with De Gruyter to make available for sale worldwide virtually all in-copyright HUP books that had become unavailable since their original publication. The 2,800 titles in the “e-ditions” program can be purchased individually as PDF eBooks or as hardcover reprint (“print-on-demand”) editions via the “Available from De Gruyter” link above. They are also available to institutions in ten separate subject-area packages that reflect the entire spectrum of the Press’s catalog. More about the E-ditions Program »

This is an inquiry into visual performance after cerebral lesions, the form and distribution of defects in visual fields, the nature of residual vision, and the possible clues in visual pathology for uncovering neural bases of normal visual perception. Of 203 men with penetrating gunshot wounds of the brain, 46 were found to have lasting visual field defects. The visual capacities of these men were surveyed in detail.

The findings differ from many previously reported in demonstrating a lack of congruence of visual field defects resulting from wounds of the pathways at all levels. The shape of field defects after penetrating wounds of the temporal lobes requires a revision of current anatomical notions about the optic radiation. The authors devote particular attention to the implications of these findings for theories of vision.

From Our Blog

The Burnout Challenge

On Burnout Today with Christina Maslach and Michael P. Leiter

In The Burnout Challenge, leading researchers of burnout Christina Maslach and Michael P. Leiter focus on what occurs when the conditions and requirements set by a workplace are out of sync with the needs of people who work there. These “mismatches,” ranging from work overload to value conflicts, cause both workers and workplaces to suffer