Cover: Naturalism, Realism, and Normativity, from Harvard University PressCover: Naturalism, Realism, and Normativity in HARDCOVER

Naturalism, Realism, and Normativity

Add to Cart

Product Details


$54.50 • £43.95 • €49.00

ISBN 9780674659698

Publication Date: 04/11/2016


248 pages

6-1/8 x 9-1/4 inches


  • Introduction: Putnam’s Philosophy and Metaphilosophy [Mario De Caro]
  • I. Liberal Naturalism and Normativity
    • 1. Naturalism, Realism, and Normativity
    • 2. On Bernard Williams’s “Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline”
    • 3. What Evolutionary Theory Doesn’t Tell Us about Ethics
  • II. Realism and Ontology
    • 4. Sosa on Internal Realism and Conceptual Relativity
    • 5. Richard Boyd on Scientific Realism
  • III. Realism and Verificationism
    • 6. Hans Reichenbach: Realist and Verificationist
    • 7. Between Scylla and Charybdis: Does Dummett Have a Way Through?
    • 8. When “Evidence Transcendence” Is Not Malign
  • IV. Naive Realism, Sensation, and Apperception
    • 9. Sensation and Apperception
    • 10. Perception without Sense Data
    • 11. “Naive Realism” and Qualia
  • V. Looking Back
    • 12. The Development of Externalist Semantics
    • 13. Sixty-Five Years of Philosophy: A Participant’s Thoughts and Experiences
  • Acknowledgments
  • Index

Recent News

Black lives matter. Black voices matter. A statement from HUP »

From Our Blog

Jacket: An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, by Bruno Latour, translated by Catherine Porter, from Harvard University Press

Honoring Latour

In awarding Bruno Latour the 2021 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy, the Inamori Foundation said he has “revolutionized the conventional view of science” and “his philosophy re-examines ‘modernity’ based on the dualism of nature and society.” Below is an excerpt from An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. For more than twenty years, scientific and technological controversies have proliferated in number and scope, eventually reaching the climate itself. Since geologists are beginning to use the term “Anthropocene” to designate the era of Earth’s history that follows the Holocene