Cover: Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification, from Harvard University PressCover: Private Truths, Public Lies in PAPERBACK

Private Truths, Public Lies

The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification

Add to Cart

Product Details

PAPERBACK

$41.50 • £33.95 • €37.50

ISBN 9780674707580

Publication Date: 09/30/1997

Short

448 pages

6-1/8 x 9-1/4 inches

17 line illustrations

World

  • Preface
  • 1. Living a Lie
    • The Significance of Preference Falsification
    • Private and Public Preferences
    • Private Opinion, Public Opinion
    • The Dynamics of Public Opinion
    • Institutional Sources of Preference Falsification
  • 2. Inhibiting Change
    • Collective Conservatism
    • The Obstinacy of Communism
    • The Ominous Perseverance of the Caste System
    • The Unwanted Spread of Affirmative Action
  • 3. Distorting Knowledge
    • Public Discourse and Private Knowledge
    • The Unthinkable and the Unthought
    • The Caste Ethic of Submission
    • The Blind Spots of Communism
    • The Unfading Specter of White Racism
  • 4. Generating Surprise
    • Unforeseen Political Revolutions
    • The Fall of Communism and Other Sudden Overturns
    • The Hidden Complexities of Social Evolution
    • From Slavery to Affirmative Action
    • Preference Falsification and Social Analysis
  • Notes
  • Index

Recent News

Black lives matter. Black voices matter. A statement from HUP »

From Our Blog

Jacket: An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, by Bruno Latour, translated by Catherine Porter, from Harvard University Press

Honoring Latour

In awarding Bruno Latour the 2021 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy, the Inamori Foundation said he has “revolutionized the conventional view of science” and “his philosophy re-examines ‘modernity’ based on the dualism of nature and society.” Below is an excerpt from An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. For more than twenty years, scientific and technological controversies have proliferated in number and scope, eventually reaching the climate itself. Since geologists are beginning to use the term “Anthropocene” to designate the era of Earth’s history that follows the Holocene