Cover: Emerson’s Plutarch, from Harvard University PressCover: Emerson’s Plutarch in E-DITION

Emerson’s Plutarch

Available from De Gruyter »

Product Details


$65.00 • £54.95 • €60.00

ISBN 9780674734258

Publication Date: 01/01/1961

337 pages


Harvard University Press has partnered with De Gruyter to make available for sale worldwide virtually all in-copyright HUP books that had become unavailable since their original publication. The 2,800 titles in the “e-ditions” program can be purchased individually as PDF eBooks or as hardcover reprint (“print-on-demand”) editions via the “Available from De Gruyter” link above. They are also available to institutions in ten separate subject-area packages that reflect the entire spectrum of the Press’s catalog. More about the E-ditions Program »

Much of Emerson’s knowledge of Greek thought originally came from Plutarch—thence, the poet’s view of fate, his interest in the Heraclitan “flux,” the stoicism which attracted him after he rejected orthodox Christianity. Supporting this thesis, Edmund Berry analyzes Emerson’s use of Plutarch and traces the poet’s changing evaluations; he shows that Emerson considered himself a Plutarchan moral essayist in the tradition of Bacon and Montaigne. Emerson’s attitude toward Greece and Rome has never been fully examined; here, for the first time, is a study of Emerson’s classical stoicism and of Plutarchan influence on his prose style.

Recent News

Black lives matter. Black voices matter. A statement from HUP »

From Our Blog

Jacket: An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, by Bruno Latour, translated by Catherine Porter, from Harvard University Press

Honoring Latour

In awarding Bruno Latour the 2021 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy, the Inamori Foundation said he has “revolutionized the conventional view of science” and “his philosophy re-examines ‘modernity’ based on the dualism of nature and society.” Below is an excerpt from An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. For more than twenty years, scientific and technological controversies have proliferated in number and scope, eventually reaching the climate itself. Since geologists are beginning to use the term “Anthropocene” to designate the era of Earth’s history that follows the Holocene