Cover: Lyric Shame: The “Lyric” Subject of Contemporary American Poetry, from Harvard University PressCover: Lyric Shame in HARDCOVER

Lyric Shame

The “Lyric” Subject of Contemporary American Poetry

Add to Cart

Product Details


$52.50 • £42.95 • €47.50

ISBN 9780674734395

Publication Date: 10/13/2014


360 pages

6-1/8 x 9-1/4 inches


Important, insightful and very much of our time, White’s book will get noticed immediately, as it should—and it will certainly affect current debates about ‘lyric’ and ‘poetry’ and the contemporary. This volume takes its place in a line of books about how aesthetic effects in modern and contemporary poetry come from, and speak to, intellectual history, to institutions, and to social life: there’s a lot we can learn from it.—Stephen Burt, co-author of The Art of the Sonnet

Gillian White has written an impressive piece of work. It marks an important critical intervention in literary history. It deftly complicates the prevailing narrative of postwar American poetry, which sees a yawning divide between open and closed, raw and cooked, lyric and anti-lyric, experimental and mainstream, expressivist and anti-expressivist, personal and collage strands of poetry. Timely, compelling, and highly readable, Lyric Shame is one of the most significant studies of American poetry published in recent decades.—Jahan Ramazani, author of Poetry and Its Others: News, Prayer, Song, and the Dialogue of Genres

Recent News

Black lives matter. Black voices matter. A statement from HUP »

From Our Blog

Jacket: An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, by Bruno Latour, translated by Catherine Porter, from Harvard University Press

Honoring Latour

In awarding Bruno Latour the 2021 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy, the Inamori Foundation said he has “revolutionized the conventional view of science” and “his philosophy re-examines ‘modernity’ based on the dualism of nature and society.” Below is an excerpt from An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. For more than twenty years, scientific and technological controversies have proliferated in number and scope, eventually reaching the climate itself. Since geologists are beginning to use the term “Anthropocene” to designate the era of Earth’s history that follows the Holocene