Cover: The Revolution That Wasn’t: How Digital Activism Favors Conservatives, from Harvard University PressCover: The Revolution That Wasn’t in HARDCOVER

The Revolution That Wasn’t

How Digital Activism Favors Conservatives

Schradie demonstrates in great detail [how] Facebook and Google work better for top-down, well-funded, disciplined, directed movements. Those adjectives tend to describe conservative groups more than liberal or leftist groups in the United States.—Siva Vaidhyanathan, The Atlantic

Schradie shifts the political conversation away from moral questions and toward questions of power, asking…how the tools of the web work in the very ordinary and unexceptional realm of electoral politics. Social media becomes a lens through which we can understand power, not an instance of power itself… We wish it was bots, that we could locate the problem inside nefarious digital practices emerging from Russia and other phantasms. Instead, as Schradie makes clear, the problem is within our borders, produced by legacies of racial and class-based terror that are as virulent—or more—in the digital age.—Emily Drabinski, The Los Angeles Review of Books

Schradie explains that, while Black Lives Matter and #MeToo capture headlines, it’s traditionally powerful conservative groups who have used digital tools to create tangible change. Hers may not be the internet culture take you want…but it’s likely the one you need.Wired

The powers of persuasion, unregulated, have changed our political landscape profoundly… The right is simply better at this than the left, and Schradie’s study explores why that is… A fascinating book that adds new insights to our understanding of the information landscape we live in today.—Barbara Fister, Inside Higher Ed

Trump has no overt presence in The Revolution That Wasn’t: How Digital Activism Favors Conservatives. But the compulsive tweeter comes constantly to mind as French sociologist Jen Schradie persuasively argues her counterintuitive case: digital organizing—once complacently thought by progressives to advantage their grassroots uprisings—has turned out to be another ‘weapon in the arsenal of the powerful.’—Brian Bethune, Maclean’s

Schradie carefully outlines how a confluence of factors help conservatives—not liberals—use digital technologies to seize state government and effect political change… Clearly illustrates that the use of technology is stratified along class lines, and finds that working-class, predominately liberal groups are at a disadvantage in the digital activism game… Timely, important, and challenges how we think about movements on the left and right.—Deana Rohlinger, Mobilization

Offers detailed analyses of the ways in which digital inequality manifests… Schradie’s superb study—easily one of the most important yet on social media’s impact on democracy—makes for grim but insightful reading.—Hans Rollmann, PopMatters

Articulates society’s creeping apprehensions about the digital world. It is not only in surveillance and fake news that digital platforms marketed for our pleasure are harming us. Even in digital activism—the use of digital technology for social change—those who support the status quo have the upper hand… Schradie…quashes the idea that digital tools aid the powerless more than the powerful.—Mary Joyce, Stanford Social Innovation Review

This well-researched and provocative text is likely to make uncomfortable reading for anyone who believes that the internet has gifted us a political ‘digital utopia.’—John Gilbey, Times Higher Education

Shows that it was conservatives who most effectively seized the digital tools at their fingertips. Like a peat fire burning undetected for a long time, right-wing individuals and groups were able to develop and formulate a clear ideology surrounding such concepts as Freedom and Truth while honing their digital media skills. This happened outside the gaze of popular pundits and academics alike… [This] also partly explains the largely unforeseen (by the same pundits) results of the 2016 U.S. elections.—Rik Smit, American Journal of Sociology

[An] excellent and important book… Schradie has written an essential contribution to current conversations around not only the use of technology for political purposes, but also about the politics of technology… This book puts forth a nuanced argument about the need for activists to really think critically about whether they’re using digital tools, or whether the digital tools are using them.—Zachary Loeb, b2o

An extraordinary read bringing together knowledge about social activism and the digital divide… A full portrait of digital activism and its variable impact on emboldening grassroots organizing and maintaining the interests of the powerful.Choice

Schradie suggests [that] the image the words ‘digital activist’ should conjure is not of a left-wing student or labor activist but instead a well-heeled think-tank denizen or technologically adept Tea Party member.Kirkus Reviews

The Revolution That Wasn’t reveals the textured reality of contemporary activism, challenging widespread assumptions about technology’s role in social movements. Beautiful storytelling and grounded insights make this book a delightful and important read for anyone who is concerned about politics today.—danah boyd, author of It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens

Don’t believe the mythology of what works in digital activism, or the hyped advice that all voices can simply count. This book lays out the real deal. Perfect for change agents aiming to turn their wild ideas into new realities.—Nilofer Merchant, author of The Power of Onlyness

The Revolution That Wasn’t synthesizes a wealth of accumulated knowledge to launch a new phase of scholarly endeavor. Blending ethnographic methods with quantitative assessments, Jen Schradie’s work shows that the claims of both digital optimists and pessimists miss the mark. She reveals that successful digital activism is linked to more traditional resources that give well-endowed groups a natural advantage, but one that can be acquired by their progressive opponents. A pleasure to read, and packed with vibrant interactions with activists of both types, Schradie’s book will take the study of digital activism to a new level.—Sidney Tarrow, author of Power in Movement

Simply put, The Revolution That Wasn’t overturns our reigning assumptions about digital activism. Schradie demonstrates how resources, organizations, and ideology shape the potentials for and outcomes of digital activism, and reveals the dynamics behind the conservative digital organizing resurgence in the U.S. since 2010. This highly readable and richly detailed book will become the first stop for those seeking to understand why the internet failed to live up to the ideals of democratic dreamers.—Daniel Kreiss, University of North Carolina

Recent News

Black lives matter. Black voices matter. A statement from HUP »

From Our Blog

Jacket: An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, by Bruno Latour, translated by Catherine Porter, from Harvard University Press

Honoring Latour

In awarding Bruno Latour the 2021 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy, the Inamori Foundation said he has “revolutionized the conventional view of science” and “his philosophy re-examines ‘modernity’ based on the dualism of nature and society.” Below is an excerpt from An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. For more than twenty years, scientific and technological controversies have proliferated in number and scope, eventually reaching the climate itself. Since geologists are beginning to use the term “Anthropocene” to designate the era of Earth’s history that follows the Holocene