Cover: Moving toward Integration: The Past and Future of Fair Housing, from Harvard University PressCover: Moving toward Integration in HARDCOVER

Moving toward Integration

The Past and Future of Fair Housing

  • List of Tables and Figures
  • Note on Census Sources
  • Introduction
  • I. The Core of the American Dilemma
    • 1. Southern Black Urbanism and the Origins of Fair Housing, 1865–1917
    • 2. The Ghetto, 1918–1940
    • 3. Shelley v. Kraemer and the Rise of Blockbusting, 1940–1959
    • 4. Public Housing, Federal Urban Policies, and the Underclass, 1934–1962
    • 5. The Creation of Fair Housing Statutes, 1959–1968
  • II. The Impact of Fair Housing Law and the Critical Decade, 1970–1980
    • 6. Implementation of the Fair Housing Act, 1968–1975
    • 7. Black Pioneers in the 1970s and the Segregation Puzzle
    • 8. Tipping versus Integration: A Delicate Balance?
    • 9. To Leap a Moving Wall: The Inversion of the Dual Housing Market, 1970–1980
  • III. The Second Generation of Fair Housing, 1975–2000
    • 10. Exclusionary Zoning and Structural Segregation
    • 11. Fair Lending, Redlining, and Black Homeownership, 1970–2000
    • 12. The Ethnic Mosaic: Shifting from Two Races to Many
    • 13. The Expansion of Federal Fair Housing Law, 1980–1995
    • 14. The Slowing of Neighborhood Racial Transition, 1980–2010
    • 15. The Reformation of Assisted Housing Programs, 1968–2012
  • IV. The Twenty-First Century
    • 16. The Effects of Segregation
    • 17. The Effect of Diversity on Integration
    • 18. Gentrification and the Evolution of White Demand
    • 19. The Mortgage Crisis and the Great Recession
    • 20. Implications of Urban Integration and Segregation in the Twenty-First Century
  • V. Solutions
    • 21. A Portfolio of Integration Strategies
    • 22. Race to the Top
    • 23. The Politics of Integration
  • Appendix
  • Notes
  • Acknowledgments
  • Index

Recent News

Black lives matter. Black voices matter. A statement from HUP »

From Our Blog

Jacket: An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, by Bruno Latour, translated by Catherine Porter, from Harvard University Press

Honoring Latour

In awarding Bruno Latour the 2021 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy, the Inamori Foundation said he has “revolutionized the conventional view of science” and “his philosophy re-examines ‘modernity’ based on the dualism of nature and society.” Below is an excerpt from An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. For more than twenty years, scientific and technological controversies have proliferated in number and scope, eventually reaching the climate itself. Since geologists are beginning to use the term “Anthropocene” to designate the era of Earth’s history that follows the Holocene