LOEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY
Cover: Natural History, Volume IV: Books 12-16, from Harvard University PressCover: Natural History, Volume IV: Books 12-16 in HARDCOVER

Loeb Classical Library 370

Natural History, Volume IV: Books 12-16

Pliny

Translated by H. Rackham

Add to Cart

Product Details

HARDCOVER

$28.00 • £19.95 • €25.00

ISBN 9780674994089

Publication Date: 01/01/1945

Loeb

576 pages

4-1/4 x 6-3/8 inches

Index

Loeb Classical Library > Natural History

World

The digital Loeb Classical Library extends the founding mission of James Loeb with an interconnected, fully searchable, perpetually growing virtual library of all that is important in Greek and Latin literature. Read more about the site’s features »

Pliny the Elder (23–79 CE), tireless researcher and writer, is author of the encyclopedic Natural History, in 37 books, an unrivaled compendium of Roman knowledge. The contents of the books are as follows:

  • Book 1: Table of contents of the others and of authorities;
  • Book 2: Mathematical and metrological survey of the universe;
  • Books 3–6: Geography and ethnography of the known world;
  • Book 7: Anthropology and the physiology of man;
  • Books 8–11: Zoology;
  • Books 12–19: Botany, agriculture, and horticulture;
  • Books 20–27: Plant products as used in medicine;
  • Books 28–32: Medical zoology;
  • Books 33–37: Minerals (and medicine), the fine arts, and gemstones.

The Loeb Classical Library edition of Natural History is in ten volumes.

Recent News

Black lives matter. Black voices matter. A statement from HUP »

From Our Blog

Jacket: We Have Never Been Modern, by Bruno Latour, translated by Catherine Porter, from Harvard University Press

Bruno Latour Wins Kyoto Prize

Congratulations to Bruno Latour for being named the 2021 Kyoto Prize laureate for arts and philosophy. To celebrate, here’s an excerpt from We Have Never Been Modern. By claiming that the modern Constitution does not permit itself to be understood, by proposing to reveal the practices that allow it to exist, by asserting that the critical mechanism has outlived its usefulness, am I behaving as though we were entering a new era that would follow the era of the moderns?