HARVARD LIBRARY OF EARLY UKRAINIAN LITERATURE
Cover: The Old Rus’ Kievan and Galician-Volhynian Chronicles in HARDCOVER

Texts 8

The Old Rus’ Kievan and Galician-Volhynian Chronicles

The Ostroz’kyj (Xlebnikov) and Cetvertyns’kyj (Pogodin) Codices

Introduction by Omeljan Pritsak

Currently unavailable

Product Details

HARDCOVER

$15.00 • £12.95 • €13.50

ISBN 9780916458379

Publication Date: 02/25/1991

Text

In ca. 1307, three Old Rus’ chronicles—the Pověst’ vremennykh lět (Tale of Bygone Years, covering the years 872–1117), Kievan Chronicle (for the years 1119–1199), and the Galician-Volhynian Chronicle (for the years 1205–1289)—were joined together. These three component parts have come down to us only in the form of a compilation (datable to ca. 1425) which scholars have named the Hypatian Chronicle.

Of the five extant witnesses of the Hypatian Chronicle, the so-called Xlebnikov codex occupies a special place. It was most probably copied in Volhynia during the second half of the sixteenth century for Prince Kostjantyn Ostroz’kyj.

The so-called Pogodin codex, closely related to the Xlebnikov, was copied in 1621 in Žyvotiv for Prince Stefan Svjatopolk-Cetvertyns’kyj.

Both the Ostroz’kyj and Cetvertyns’kyj codices appear here for the first time in facsimile. Until now they have been known only from footnotes to editions of the Hypatian Chronicle.

Recent News

Black lives matter. Black voices matter. A statement from HUP »

From Our Blog

Jacket: An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, by Bruno Latour, translated by Catherine Porter, from Harvard University Press

Honoring Latour

In awarding Bruno Latour the 2021 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy, the Inamori Foundation said he has “revolutionized the conventional view of science” and “his philosophy re-examines ‘modernity’ based on the dualism of nature and society.” Below is an excerpt from An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. For more than twenty years, scientific and technological controversies have proliferated in number and scope, eventually reaching the climate itself. Since geologists are beginning to use the term “Anthropocene” to designate the era of Earth’s history that follows the Holocene