HARVARD LIBRARY OF EARLY UKRAINIAN LITERATURE
Cover: Rus’ Restored: Selected Writings of Meletij Smotryc’kyj (1610–1630), from Harvard University PressCover: Rus’ Restored in HARDCOVER

English Translations 7

Rus’ Restored

Selected Writings of Meletij Smotryc’kyj (1610–1630)

Translated with commentary by David A. Frick

Meletij Smotryc'kyj

Add to Cart

Product Details

HARDCOVER

$32.50 • £26.95 • €29.50

ISBN 9780916458645

Publication Date: 03/31/2006

Short

Meletij Smotryc’kyj was at the center of the debates that agitated Ruthenia in the period following the Union of Brest (1596). This was a turbulent time for Ukraine, as the Uniate and Orthodox Churches sought to gain control over the confessional lives of Ruthenians. An ongoing debate was waged in writing, with each side publishing impassioned attacks on their opponents’ views and fervent defenses of their own. A prominent religious figure and polemicist, Smotryc’kyj was caught up in the struggle between Orthodox and Uniate beliefs.

In the early 1600s, Smotryc’kyj emerged as one of the leading spokesmen for Ruthenian renewal under the Orthodox, or dis-Uniate, banner. His polemics served as the cornerstone of the Orthodox response to the Polish-Lithuanian Reformation and Counter-Reformation. He later converted to Uniatism in 1627 and sought to expose the weaknesses of the Orthodox Church, arguing for a new unity between the eastern and western Churches. The works collected in this volume, written by Smotryc’kyj over a period of twenty years, offer unique insight into the elite of early modern Rus’ and their place in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

Recent News

Black lives matter. Black voices matter. A statement from HUP »

From Our Blog

Jacket: An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, by Bruno Latour, translated by Catherine Porter, from Harvard University Press

Honoring Latour

In awarding Bruno Latour the 2021 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy, the Inamori Foundation said he has “revolutionized the conventional view of science” and “his philosophy re-examines ‘modernity’ based on the dualism of nature and society.” Below is an excerpt from An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. For more than twenty years, scientific and technological controversies have proliferated in number and scope, eventually reaching the climate itself. Since geologists are beginning to use the term “Anthropocene” to designate the era of Earth’s history that follows the Holocene