Cover: The Crimea Question: Identity, Transition, and Conflict, from Harvard University PressCover: The Crimea Question in PAPERBACK

The Crimea Question

Identity, Transition, and Conflict

Add to Cart

Product Details


$29.95 • £23.95 • €27.00

ISBN 9781932650129

Publication Date: 04/28/2014


  • Acknowledgments
  • Maps
  • Introduction
  • Part 1
    • 1. Identity and Conflict in Transition
    • 2. Imagining Crimea: The Symbols and Myths of a Politicized Landscape
    • 3. The Making of History: Writing and Rewriting “Crimea”
    • 4. The Institutional Legacies of Territory and Ethnicity
    • 5. Reassessing the 1954 Transfer of Crimea
  • Part 2
    • 6. The Last Soviet ASSR: The Mobilization of Crimean Separatism
    • 7. Crimea’s Post-Soviet Russian Movement: The Rise and Fall of Separatism
    • 8. Integrating Crimea into the Ukrainian State
    • 9. Crimean Autonomy and Its Aftermath
    • 10. The International Dimensions of the Crimea Question
  • Conclusion
  • Epilogue
  • Appendix 1: The Crimean Population, 1897–2001
  • Appendix 2: Elite Interviews in April and September–October 1996
  • Appendix 3: Regional Elite Turnover and Profile, 1990–98
  • Notes
  • Works Cited
  • Index

Awards & Accolades

  • 2008 Alexander Nove Prize in Russia, Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies, British Association for Slavonic and East European Studies
Join Our Mailing List [picture of mailboxes in a rustic setting]

Recent News

Black lives matter. Black voices matter. A statement from HUP »

From Our Blog

Jacket: An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, by Bruno Latour, translated by Catherine Porter, from Harvard University Press

Honoring Latour

In awarding Bruno Latour the 2021 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy, the Inamori Foundation said he has “revolutionized the conventional view of science” and “his philosophy re-examines ‘modernity’ based on the dualism of nature and society.” Below is an excerpt from An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. For more than twenty years, scientific and technological controversies have proliferated in number and scope, eventually reaching the climate itself. Since geologists are beginning to use the term “Anthropocene” to designate the era of Earth’s history that follows the Holocene